The women's groups in Papua New Guinea went very close to being taken over in the months before the vote in parliament on the 22 reserved seats. Please click:
FOREIGN LESBIANS AND 22 RESERVED SEATS
FOREIGN LESBIANS AND 22 RESERVED SEATS
With only 22 seats, there was never one woman candidate for every electorate. There would not have been a general election. Women would have been nominated from women's groups.
There would have been a tussle between women's groups and young lesbians who had just joined with a plan to take over and control the nominations for the 22 seats.
There would have been a process called stacking particularly prior to an annual general meeting.
I once lived in a small town in Australia. There was a plan for the ALP Government to build a gaol on the outskirts of the town.
The local Progress Association supported the proposal. Then one night the annual general meeting was held, attended by about 30 newcomers. They paid their annual dues and sat down.
By the end of the night, they had nominated one another for the executive positions and taken over. This was stacking.
It happens all the time in party branches particularly in the Australian Labor Party.
Some organizations have in their constitution that a new member has to attend 6 meetings before being allowed to vote in an annual general meeting or stand for election.
The women's groups find a dilemma in that they need more young women. They have to be wary of young women with a hidden agenda supported by foreign organizations.
They may well ignore the needs of the family in the community and seek to introduce a gay and lesbian agenda.
They would want to put women into more than one of the 22 seats of parliament with a view to taking over the Department for Community Development.
That would be the start of the push towards same sex marriage, adoption of children, lesbians recruited as welfare officers and children put into care.
Could this have happened? We will never know. The delays in bringing the draft legislation to parliament gave the women's groups no chance to organize for the 2012 election.
But if the legislation went through early, there would have been action by foreign lesbians to have lesbian women either infliltrate women's groups, arouse as sleepers or set up their own group.
As it was, the legislation failed.
Women's groups should look to their constitution on voting rights and standing for office.
If the foreign lesbians were cheeky enough to push for gay and lesbian sex legislation with no community consultation and 22 reserved seats, they would have no problems about stacking women's groups.
Remember that UN Women was running courses for women planning to be among the 22 seat reserved members of parliament. There was more to that than meets the eye. Who selected these women?
All that is written here is quite logical.
If the UN lesbians were pushing for legalization of homosexual sex and 22 seats. they would have pushed hard on the Minister. This they did.
If the 22 seat legislation had succeeded, they would have moved into action to ensure they pushed a lesbian or five into the 22 seats.
If the nominations were through women's groups, the UN lesbians would have stacked the groups. They were playing for keeps.
The finger needs to be put on UN Women.
Papua New Guinea would have found their parliament linked to the dictates of the New World Order.
The women's groups find a dilemma in that they need more young women. They have to be wary of young women with a hidden agenda supported by foreign organizations.
They may well ignore the needs of the family in the community and seek to introduce a gay and lesbian agenda.
They would want to put women into more than one of the 22 seats of parliament with a view to taking over the Department for Community Development.
That would be the start of the push towards same sex marriage, adoption of children, lesbians recruited as welfare officers and children put into care.
Could this have happened? We will never know. The delays in bringing the draft legislation to parliament gave the women's groups no chance to organize for the 2012 election.
But if the legislation went through early, there would have been action by foreign lesbians to have lesbian women either infliltrate women's groups, arouse as sleepers or set up their own group.
As it was, the legislation failed.
Women's groups should look to their constitution on voting rights and standing for office.
If the foreign lesbians were cheeky enough to push for gay and lesbian sex legislation with no community consultation and 22 reserved seats, they would have no problems about stacking women's groups.
Remember that UN Women was running courses for women planning to be among the 22 seat reserved members of parliament. There was more to that than meets the eye. Who selected these women?
All that is written here is quite logical.
If the UN lesbians were pushing for legalization of homosexual sex and 22 seats. they would have pushed hard on the Minister. This they did.
If the 22 seat legislation had succeeded, they would have moved into action to ensure they pushed a lesbian or five into the 22 seats.
If the nominations were through women's groups, the UN lesbians would have stacked the groups. They were playing for keeps.
The finger needs to be put on UN Women.
Papua New Guinea would have found their parliament linked to the dictates of the New World Order.
No comments:
Post a Comment