It is difficult to come to terms with the fact that Positive Living should cause such hatred and division in Papua New Guinea. There is likely to be 99.9% support from families and churches.
There has been deep opposition and hatred from the gay, lesbian and paedophile community that would account for about zero percent of the indigenous population.
The family has been under attack. The authority of parents was to be removed and replaced with a new class of homosexual officers in welfare, legal, health, police and education.
Children were to have full rights with no responsibilities and all rights to sex with paedophile adults. Parents had nothing but children who ignored them.
The papers of the Chiangmai International HIV/AIDS conference in 2002 showed that Positive Living grew out of Africa among HIV infected families and church care groups. So this is a reason why Positive Living is rejected by the homosexual lobby.
Positive Living families were strong in the faith and not likely to succumb to the pressure of the homosexual lobby. The most well known writer to the Chiangmai conference was Dipuo Bogatsu of Tanzania who became the Commonwealth Ambassador for Positive Living.
The goal of Positive Living was to give hope and life skills to people living with HIV/AIDS in an era when antiretroviral drugs were not freely available. It is still important.
But the gay paedophile agenda was much wider and involved restructuring families in society. They had hyjacked the AIDS awareness agenda. The gay and lesbian message had nothing to do with HIV and AIDS. It promoted sex rather than limited sex in society.
No comments:
Post a Comment