15 May 2012 34 Pageviews (on day 1)
|
Hitler invaded Poland after a fake claim of attack on Germany by a group of Polish nationals on a border radio station. Cries and gunfire could be heard on radio all over Germany.
Gunslingers in cowboy movies always make the other person draw first. So the trick was to push the other person into weak retaliation prior to being killed.
Some time ago, Jackson attacked AIDS Holistics during the gay and lesbian email attack in 2010. When the response came, he then claimed a spam attack by the founder of AIDS Holistics.
He quickly removed all reports so that readers could not see the nature of the attack. That worked so well in his mind, he tried it again two years later.
On attacking The National, he claimed false advice made by The National to Barracuda that resulted in his emails being blocked.
But that was not enough. He also claimed a spam attack on his blog again. We have cut and pasted his report to prevent him from making changes on realizing he made a bad move.
He blamed The National for the spam attack. Up to his old tricks. The words in yellow have been removed from his blog report after one day. These words no longer exist.
Who the hell do they think they are?
The Martyn Namorong post at the head of this page has been spammed mercilessly with well over 100 faux comments in the last 24 hours.
As a result I've had to add a comment verification step for commenters. My apologies for the additional work this imposes...
As a result I've had to add a comment verification step for commenters. My apologies for the additional work this imposes...
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Dylan, there is no problem with blocking an address because of persistent spam - it seems the right move to make. But why can't the message to the blocked address say just that, rather than the "poor reputation" line. I despair at the use of the English language.
Dylan, there is no problem with blocking an address because of persistent spam - it seems the right move to make. But why can't the message to the blocked address say just that, rather than the "poor reputation" line. I despair at the use of the English language.
Hi Keith - By poor reputation, Barracuda usually means it in a technical sense rather than personal (i.e. you are on an ip range that has been reported for spam - or has been infected with malware etc).
They can even end up blocking whole hosts for persistent issues. It also doesn't necessarily mean that the issues are to do with the person you have been emailing - as they use data reported in one area to help filter others.
Posted by: Dylan Brown | 16 May 2012 at 06:25 AM
He even posted an example of the 100 spams that hit his blog on that day. The spam looked like a bona fide blog advertising mail order medicine.
By the end of the day, he removed the spams he had posted for all to see and the paragraphs above. This is like old times. We cut and pasted in anticipation of his heavy editing. We beat him to any removals.
Jackson is either making false claims or is not the full quid. Accolytes have tried to changed the subject by reports today on condoms and the Catholic church. I am starting to see Peter Kranz in a new light.
Now they have mounted an anti-church campaign on...wait for it...International Day against Homophobia and Transphobia May 17 as reported on the ABC internet news.
But Jackson can not have a poor reputation. He is a god like the emperor Caligula and a legend in his own lunch-time. . Good try boys. We will get to condoms later. First things first. Please click:
Catholic church attitude on condoms promotes misery
Jackson talked of taking the founder of AIDS Holistics to Court for some reason. He can show the judge my defamations. I will show the judge Jackson's.
He has to realize that the more a person defames, the less chance he has of taking successful Court action. It becomes tit for tat. Case dismissed. Smarter than the average adjunct professor.
Heil Hitler.