A New Zealand woman who admitted smacking her 8 year old child has had her assault conviction quashed by a New Zealand court of appeal.
Lobby group Family First a critic of anti-smacking laws said the law was an example of good parents being criminalized.
The appeal judges said they had sympathy for her. She had sought expert help to deal with her child's behaviour difficulties and had tried various non-physical measures.
Family First Director Bob McCroskie said the case sent a warning to parents about what they admit to authorities.
She has had her career damaged, faced legal fees and has irreparable damage caused to her family.
Comment: We have to be balanced and reasonable in all of this. We have groups who want to stop all smacking of children.
Some groups are run by anti-family lesbians who want to damage authority of parents. Please click:
ANTI-FAMILY COUNSELLING
Parents understand that non-violent discipline has severe limitations. If the child flatly refuses to co-operate, what does the parent do then? Non-violent discipline makes weak parents weaker. Please click:
SUPER NANNY STATE
Young children can be very egocentric and do not accept being told to do anything. They see themselves as the boss in the house.
If told to sit over there, they refuse. If told they are grounded, they leave the house. Nothing works. If told no pocket money, they steal.
Non-violent discipline occurs naturally if the house is well run. Children wake up and go to bed at set times.
They do their homework before watching TV. They eat at set times and all come to the table. They are not robots but living with order in their lives.
But egocentric children who believe that they are in charge of the house. They see their parents as servants.
Parents are pleading with them to behave. They can refuse and the parents go away to plead again in an hour or two.
Please go to bed. No. Please eat your dinner. No. Please do not jump on your beds. No. The parents are subordinate to their kids. Please come home before 5.00pm. No.
The lesbian welfare scumbags are pleased.
It is time for parental restrategizing. I once had a young boy living in my house. He totally dominated his mother, even to the point of punching her if she did not comply with his demands.
If I scolded him, he would cry and cry. He expected me to apologize and his mother to run to his defence.
Poor little bully. But instead I whacked him and told him that if he cries for nothing, I will whack him.
I will give him reason to cry. That went on for a month and then all crying stopped forever.
It took another month to start doing as he was told. Then he became a well behaved and loving young boy.
He started to realize that he gained more from being a cooperative and polite little boy. Benefits start to flow.
The child was not being subservient but acknowledging his place in a loving family as a satellizing dependant. That story will make the lesbians go crazy.
That was a key theme of David P. Ausubel in his book on child psychology. He wrote of a child moving from the omnipotent stage to a satellizing role as parents lovingly limit childish tantrums and demands.
His books were the most difficult I have ever read. It sometimes took ten minutes to read one paragraph and conceptualize what had been written.
Ego Development and Psychopathology - Google Books Result
books.google.com/books?isbn=1560002662...David Paul Ausubel - 1996 -
Psychology - 301 pages David Paul Ausubel ... and of retaining thereby the
approval that confirms for him his good standing as a satellizer in their eyes. ...
achievement-oriented mother is dominant in Ego Omnipotence and Satellization
during Infancy and Childhood 47
A good smack was the only option. The child had to learn cause and effect. So do all citizens.
If you kill, you go to gaol. If you drink and drive, you lose your license. Destructive violence to children is unacceptable to us all.
Understanding of action and consequences has to be developed in children. Conscience starts as a fear of consequences. Then it is supported by human values.
How many young women in anti-violence groups are not married? have no children? and are lesbian?
Save the Children in Papua New Guinea opposes violence to children but supports condoms for kids. Please click:
KIDS HAVE THE RIGHT TO SEX
Lesbian welfare officers may well have told children that they have all rights and no responsibilities. Parents have all responsibilities and no rights. They are deliberately sabotaging family unity.
How many have an ideological anti-family reason for banning smacking? Please click:
OUR KIDS BELONG TO THE STATE
But hidden below all this is a more insidious agenda: Please click:
DESTROY THE AGE OF CONSENT
******************
Focus on the Family: Helping Families Thrive
Focus on the Family provides relevant Christian advice
on marriage, parenting and other topics. Find practical
resources for every age and lifestage.
on marriage, parenting and other topics. Find practical
resources for every age and lifestage.
No comments:
Post a Comment