UNITED NATIONS SPOILS FAMILY

As a student in high school, I studied modern history. A
key topic was the work of the United Nations. I read a
poem of a century ago that referred to death raining from
the skies and emergence of a world government to bring
peace to all.

It was supposed to prophesy the League of Nations after
World War 1.

We studied the failure of the League of Nations that was

slowly rejected by many nations particularly in a failure to
make decisions to slow the emergence of dictatorships.

We studied the work of the United Nations and rejoiced

that only good can come.

Organizations of the United Nations seemed to be doing
good for men, women and children of the world. There
was a declaration of the central importance of the family.
There were statements of rights for all, mainly children.
On the face of it, this was a key to the world future.

But times have changed over the last thirty years. The

United Nations is no longer family focused. Rights are

promoted without family or responsibilities.

A new power group has moved into the United Nations

with the impetus of the world HIV/AIDS response. They

have moved to help countries struggling with the pandemic

but are pulling a massive Trojan horse.

They have taken the charters of the United Nations that are

guidelines and given these the status of United Nations laws

to be signed and obeyed by nations. It beats standing for

parliament in all of the countries of the world.

Within the Trojan horse, there is a hidden contingent of gay

and lesbian men and women ready to promote rights for gays

and lesbians disguised as human rights. No one opposes human

rights. These people are on a real winner. Human rights is as
offensive as mother’s milk.

Human rights is offensive if not accompanied by responsibilities.

Then it comes down to the myth that all people have the right to

sit back and demand rights without work.

The United Nations gays and lesbians are working on  Christian

nations with the view that there should be no discrimination. That

means that gays /lesbians have inalienable rights no matter what

is written in the Bible or Koran.

They have come into Papua New Guinea to help with HIV/AIDS

but come up with another agenda. Apart from WHO, these people

know nothing about HIV/AIDS. They are more interested in telling

women, boys and girls about their responsibility-less rights.

They are not interested in family. They have picked and chosen what

the United Nations stands for. Family is not part of it. Focus on

children’s rights is teaching children to disobey their parents.

The United Nations one world government is turning into something

really nasty. The Moslems have always told us that. Children of the

world are being subverted to reject family and authority of parents.

Take the Charter of Rights of the child. How old is a child? It is

certain that a child is under the age of consent for most countries.

Yet children have the right of association. This is the killer clause.

Does that mean they can go wherever they want? Is that why Save

the Children interviews children without knowledge of their parents?

Does that means children can be counseled with advice hostile to

parents and family? That can happen in Papua New Guinea as the

Government is signatory to the Rights of the Child.

The nations of the world, signatories to the Charter should demand

a change. It should be written that all people have rights. But there

are people who are helpless due to young or old age and disability

who are allowed rights and not pressed to be responsible.

But all other people including growing children have to accept that

as they grow to maturity, they have responsibilities that accompany

every right. Primary responsibility is towards the family except those

who are orphans, abused and homeless.

But here we have a major loop-hole. The United Nations charters

are so detailed that families can be accused of abuse on all kinds

of matters.

No money for school lunches - abuse. Children not allowed to say

what they like – abuse. Children not allowed to go down the road to

stay with the family there –abuse.

A person dying of AIDS has the right to ARV drugs. Perhaps that is

a privilege more than a right. They have diminishing responsibility in

their conduct as dementia approaches.

Children have the right to education but responsibility to go to school

and study. They have the right to an opinion but the responsibility to

tell the truth and not unnecessarily hurt people.

Signatory nations in the world should advise the United Nations that

the Charter of Children’s Rights is null and void until balanced by the

amendments made on rights and responsibilities.

The United Nations has the responsibility to support family. We have

the right to expect that. Or United Nations may one day go the way

of the dodo and dinosaurs.

People of Papua New Guinea know what to expect as the result of

\domination and bullying from the gays and lesbians of the Australian

aid organization AusAID.

They follow the career path to Save the Children and United Nations.

They talk of discrimination but are the greatest discriminators on the

planet funded by the Australian tax payer.

The United Nations as a one world government is becoming its own

worst enemy. It has to be real about its statements on family.